|
|

Low Natural Gas Prices Draw More Players to the Game
By Gina Diorio
Choice
is at very heart of consumerism. Americans shop for
cars or decide what food to buy knowing that choice
is what drives competition and gives them leverage
as consumers.
Yet when
it comes to natural gas and electricity, many
consumers set their thermostats and flick their
light switches without ever considering choice of
these commodities.

With
natural gas prices at record low levels, gas meters
become cash registers as they offer homeowners and
businesses the opportunity to save on their energy
bills by shopping for a supplier.
Under
the Electric Discount and Energy Competition Act of
1999 (EDECA), New Jersey consumers have been free to
shop around for energy providers for more than a
decade. The act separated utility bills into supply
and delivery components, opening the former to
competition and allowing consumers to shop for their
natural gas and electricity at competitive prices.
According to an energy shopping guide issued by the
New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (BPU), “(L)ocal
electric or natural gas distribution companies still
deliver the supplies through their wires or pipes –
and respond to emergencies, should they occur – but
the supplies themselves are purchased from other
companies.”
In the
natural gas market, the number of these “other
companies” is rising, spurred in part by new
technology such as fracture drilling that is opening
up natural gas sources previously thought untappable,
such as the Marcellus Shale Formation that straddles
Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York and West Virginia.
According to the Delaware River Basin Commission,
fracture drilling uses “large amounts of fresh water
to fracture the formation to release the natural
gas.”
This
method, however, is not without controversy because
the water recovered from the process contains
“natural gas and chemicals…as well as brine and
other contaminants,” which some fear has led to
contamination of water supplies and resultant health
and environmental risks.
Nevertheless, these emerging sources of natural gas
and other market factors have helped keep natural
gas prices at an alltime low, about $5 per thousand
cubic feet versus more than $14 per thousand cubic
feet just two years ago. That is encouraging
third-party suppliers to step into the market.
But how
reliable are third-party suppliers? What are the
benefits and risks of switching? And what do
consumers need to know to make the choice that is
best for them?
New
Jersey business and residential customers are served
by one of four utilities for natural gas (where
available) and one of four utilities for
electricity.
PSE&G is
the one company that acts as a supplier of both.
James
Campos, PSE&G manager of supplier relations, notes
that switching to a third-party supplier can prove
beneficial.
“I’ve
seen it in cases when the price of gas may have gone
down, and customers tend to try to renegotiate
their contract with the supplier,” he said.
“Sometimes it’s successful, and sometimes it’s not.”
Campos
cautions, however, that when developing a contract
with a supplier, customers – and particularly
business customers, who face greater price
fluctuations – should keep a wary eye on
what is being offered.
Paul
Bralczyk, manager of basic gas supply service for
PSE&G, echoes this, noting that while prices are
currently low, there is no way of knowing if they
will remain low, and the contract is key.
Tami
Gerke of Elizabethtown Gas, which serves
natural gas customers in Union and Middlesex
counties as well as in Northwestern New Jersey,
explained the process of switching from the utility
to a third-party supplier.
“A
homeowner or business contacts a third-party
supplier, or the third-party supplier through a
sales effort contacts the customer,” she said. “Once
the contractual price and other conditions of
service are established with the third-party
supplier, the supplier enrolls the customer through
an automated electronic process.”
The
switch is seamless in terms of delivery of the
commodity itself. The natural gas is still delivered
to the customer through the utility’s distribution
system.
Under
state law customers who switch to a third-party
provider may switch back to their utility at any
time, although contractual stipulations – including
financial penalties – and/or a time delay may apply.
Because of this, experts agree it is important for
customers to understand the terms of their contract
before making the switch. Regardless of contracts,
however, customers will not face service
interruptions should their third-party supplier
default or go out of business.
“If a
third-party energy provider goes out of business,
Elizabethtown Gas will take the affected customers
back into commodity service,” Gerke said.
While
cost savings is certainly a strong draw for
third-party suppliers, it is not the only draw.
“[T]hird-party suppliers can offer customers
packaged products that a traditional utility cannot
offer,” said Steven Maslak, president and CEO of
Gateway Energy Services, a third-party supplier
offering natural gas and electric choice to
residential and business consumers. “At Gateway, our
New Jersey customers can mix and match fixed- and
variable-rate plans for their natural gas and
electricity.
“For
example, many of our customers choose to fix their
electricity rates through the end of the year to
avoid New Jersey utilities’ summer rate hikes, while
opting for a variable rate on natural gas.”
Third-party suppliers also can offer various
discounts and incentives, such as Gateway Energy
Services’ sign-up promotions and Military Discount
Program, according to Maslak.
Steven
Sooby, central region sales director for Hess
Corporation – a third-party provider serving
commercial and industrial customers – notes the
big-picture dimension of energy choice benefits.
“Competitive energy providers have a range of
pricing and usage options that help a business
develop a long-term energy strategy that fits their
needs and budget,” he said.“In many cases, products
such as fixed and variable rate pricing and green
energy are not available from the local utility.”
Sooby
suggests that businesses shopping for a natural gas
supplier consider six factors: total energy needs,
risk tolerance, reliability, service and
relationship, value/cost transparency, and
environmental/conservation goals.
According to Jim Faulkner, an associate with
Viridian Energy – a third-party supplier that offers
green electricity with a minimum 20 percent
renewable content – non-profit organizations also
can benefit from switching.
“The
first benefit is a potential 10 or 15 percent
reduction in (the) energy bill, whether gas or
electric,” Faulkner said.
Additionally, Viridian operates a referral program
that rewards customers such as nonprofits for
helping others switch, as well as an associate
program that allows associates to earn a commission
based on the total number of Viridian customers in
their organization.
“There
doesn’t appear to be a downside,” Faulkner said.
Consumers debating switching and wary of the
unregulated third-party supplier versus the
regulated utility should note that third-party
suppliers must be licensed by the BPU before they
can serve customers in New Jersey.
“(C)ustomers may be able to achieve cost savings or
price stability by switching” to a third-party
supplier, according to BPU public information
officer Doyal Siddell.
Yet
while low natural gas prices make it is a buyer’s
market for third-party suppliers right now, that is
not always the case, Siddell added.
“Utilities hedge a portion of their supply,” he
said. “Therefore, in a rising market, it is more
difficult for third-party suppliers to compete since
a portion of the utility supply was locked in at
lower prices. Conversely, in a declining market, it
is easier for third-party suppliers to compete since
the portion of the utility supply was locked in at
higher prices.”
Consumers considering third-party options may visit
the BPU web page for more information on shopping
for an energy supplier:
www.nj.gov/bpu/commercial/shopping.html.
Whether
remaining with their utility or switching to a
third-party supplier, however,
New
Jersey customers can take comfort in knowing that,
like the car they drive or the food they buy, the
choice is fully theirs.
Top



Local Small
Business Wins Big
Through
National YouTube Contest
By Christopher Reardon
Crime-infested Bedford Stuyvesant in Brooklyn and
serene Memorial Park in Maplewood are as far apart
as the North and South Poles yet can be visited
through a click of the mouse in just two minutes.
It is an
inspiring trip.
Carlos
Sanchez, founder of the fitness business Maplewood
BootCamps, recently turned to online technology to
step back into his old haunt of Bed-Stuy and then
magically into the safe confines of Maplewood to
create a two-minute video about his business that
landed a $50,000 grand prize in the U.S. Chamber of
Commerce “I am Free Enterprise” contest.

Clients of Maplewood
BootCamps find fitness made fun through a sense of
community and group support.
The
contest is part of the chamber’s Campaign for Free
Enterprise, which is supporting free
enterprise, raising awareness of the important role
small businesses play in the national economy and
promoting creation of 20 million jobs in 10 years.
The
chamber solicited videos from businesses that would
tell their free enterprise and entrepreneurial story
and received more than 130 submissions. Five
finalist were aired on YouTube for one month, where
they were viewed more than 95,000 times and voted on
by the public.
“I am
Carlos Sanchez and I am Free Enterprise” was voted
the winner.
Sanchez
is no newbie to electronic media. The entrepreneur
has built his business not only on sweat and dreams
but also on technology and connecting to target
audiences through the Internet. He promotes his
business through his company web site and blog;
Facebook, YouTube and Twitter; and an electronic
newsletter he sends to clients and perspective
campers. He also leveraged his extensive sneaker
collection to create videos that have been seen by
more than 4 million viewers.
Sanchez
also uses traditional marketing, such as fliers and
direct mail, and recently introduced a session card
that provides clients with more flexibility in
attending the camp, recognizing today’s demanding
schedules as well as the realities of a down economy
in which consumers do not want to waste their
spending dollars.
Entrepreneurs succeed when they identify consumer
needs and create products or services that fill
those voids. Sanchez developed the idea for his
fitness boot camp while working as a personal
trainer at a chain fitness center.
“The
majority of people don’t get the results they want
when working with a personal trainer or going to a
gym,” he said. “But the group atmosphere provides
support. They’re accountable to each other. It’s
that sense of building the community.”
Maplewood BootCamps provides a structured, group
exercise experience in fourweek programs of two,
three or as many as seven days a week. Each day
consists of 45-minute sessions comprising five- and
10-minute blocs of exercises working on different
areas of the body. Campers work at their own pace
but under the supervision of Sanchez and other
trainers, yet often are teamed up for fun and
competition and to strengthen the sense of community
and accomplishment.
Sanchez
focuses on both campers’ bodies and minds, he said.
“It’s
great if you lose weight or get stronger, but it’s
more about seeing an obstacle, making a plan and
attacking and overcoming it,” he said. “That’s what
fitness has done for me. When there was a time in my
life when I was down I started to exercise and
everything changed. I wanted to change the world.”
Sanchez
came from a world of crime, drugs and poverty and
made a plan to overcome these obstacles.
“Free
enterprise was my ticket out,” he said.
Recognizing and supporting that vision and drive is
the goal of the U.S. Chamber’s Campaign for Free
Enterprise, according to Mary Kane, director,
special projects at the chamber.
“We felt
that the American people were losing their gut
instincts of why businesses were started in this
country,” said Kane, whose parents emigrated from
Ireland in the 1950s seeking a chance to build new
lives. “We wanted to say thank you for taking a huge
risk and starting (their) own business.”
Not
taking risk is true failure, according to Sanchez, a
philosophy that drives his entrepreneurial spirit
and which he tries to instill in his clients.
“BootCamp is not an intimidating place,” he said.
“It’s a safe place that encourages them to do the
best they can. The hardest part is just showing up.
Once they’re there I keep them moving…There aren’t
any mistakes. If you fall over, your body is
learning what it needs to stay up. There is no
failure. Failure is not showing up.”
Top
 

By Andy Gole

Great
poets express ideas and emotions beyond our
day-to-day capacity. These poets activate and
connect us with a dormant part of our humanity,
helping us grow and experience life on a higher
plane.
Great
salespeople provide a similar function for their
clients.
Very
often the prospect or client can’t articulate what
she needs.
Particularly for the infrequent purchase, the
prospect usually is not an expert. Very often, he
focuses on surface issues – product/service features
– or the economics of the sale: “I need your very
best price – after all, I’m in a pennies business.”
The
great salesperson shows prospects the latent – or
unexpressed – possibilities.
Economic
history is the realization of latent demand – the
fulfillment of possibilities.
For
instance, consider the:
1. Actual demand for automobiles in 1860.
2. Actual demand for computers in 1945 (worldwide
demand was reportedly estimated at one computer).
There
was immense latent demand for both automobiles and
computers. These latent demands were activated when:
(1) new technologies made the innovations economical
and
(2) the message was effectively communicated to the
target audience.
Great
salespeople play the latter role – they convey the
possibilities, the vision, to the prospect.
It
doesn’t take a game-changing innovation like the
computer to invoke the salesperson as poet – as
visionary.
Consider
the classic dichotomy of builder’s grade vs. quality
– also known as first cost vs. total cost.
The
buyer often has a short-term orientation: the money
spent today. Thus, he focuses on first cost.
But most
purchases have a future benefit or impact.
Conceptually, this impact is not as obvious.
It’s the
salesperson’s job to show the prospect the long-term
impact of the decision – to consider the total cost.
It is his or her job to show the prospect the
difference between:
1. Doing it right – minimizing total cost with
quality versus…
2. Doing it repeatedly by focusing on the short-term
and buying low-cost builder’s grade.
Whereas
the marketer does this en masse, the salesperson
does this “belly to belly,” in the trenches, one
person at a time – the most effective method of
persuasion.
If the
customer buys low-quality builder’s grade and
suffers the consequences, there was a failure
somewhere in selling.
The
salesperson failed to rise to her role as poet.
Historically, nations acknowledged great poets as
“Poet Laureates.” Our economic well-being would be
substantially enhanced if we also designated great
salespeople as “Salesperson Laureates.”
Top





Recession Unites Employees of All Ages
But younger workers look to
move after recovery
The more
things change, the more different generations of
workers become the same, according to a new study
from staffing firm Robert Half.
The
study shows that workers of all ages have a new
appreciation for company stability when making
career decisions. Yet for many, attaining firmer
ground may entail a career change: Four out of 10
professionals polled said they are more inclined to
look for new opportunities outside their current
place of employment as a result of the recession.
Other
findings include:
• Pay
is not keeping up with performance. More than
one-third (37 percent) of employees felt they are
not being fairly compensated for assuming a greater
workload during the recession.
•
Work is more engaging. About one in four (28
percent) said they are more engaged in their work as
a result of the recession.
•
Generational views on next career steps differ.
For Gen Y (approximately 21 to 31 years old),
looking for a new job is the most common
post-recession career plan, whereas Gen X workers
(approximately 32 to 45 years old) polled said they
are more inclined to update their skills. Baby
boomers (approximately 46 to 64 years old) said
staying put at their current companies was the most
commonly cited post-recession career plan.
•
Cross-generational teams bring challenges, rewards.
Nearly three-quarters (72 percent) of hiring
managers said managing multigenerational work teams
poses a challenge. But more than one-third of
workers polled felt having a group of employees at
different experience levels increases productivity.
•
Retirement plans are being put on hold. Nearly
half (46 percent) of workers believe they will work
past the traditional retirement age, and more than
one-third said the recent recession has had a very
strong impact on those plans.
The
study was developed by Robert Half and conducted by
an independent research firm. The study polled more
than 1,400 professionals in North America who are
employed full-time and have college degrees, or are
earning college degrees, including 502 hiring
managers. Respondents included members of the baby
boomer generation, Generation X and Generation Y.
The
study identified a number of similarities and
differences among generations of workers.
Generational Similarities – For all generations:
1.
Working for a stable company and having job security
were the two most important aspects of the work
environment.
2.
Salary, company stability and benefits were the most
important factors when evaluating employment offers.
3.
Healthcare coverage, dental coverage, vacation time
and 401(k) matching were the highest valued
benefits.
4. Among
professionals who plan to work past the traditional
retirement age, a majority cited the past recession
as an important factor.
5. The
most commonly cited benefit of being part of
multigenerational work teams was bringing together
various experience levels to provide knowledge in
specific areas.
Generational Differences
1. When
it comes to post-recession career plans, more Gen Y
worker planned to look for new job opportunities.
2. Gen X
workers were more inclined to enhance their skills
sets and build tenure with their companies after the
recession.
3. A
greater percentage of baby boomers said they will
work past the traditional retirement age.
4. More
Gen X workers said they had increased their
retirement savings since the recession began.
5. More
baby boomers identified the greatest challenge when
working with multiple generations as having
differing work ethics and approaches to work/life
balance.
“Many
employees, particularly Gen Y professionals, are
biding their time in their current employment
situations and plan to make a move when they feel
the economy is on firmer footing,” said Brett Good,
a Robert Half International district president. “Now
is the time for employers to take action and outline
career paths within their company for strong
performers.
Compensation reviews also should be conducted to
ensure that pay is competitive.”





Inside Views
A Tale of Two Cities

“Boss,
boss, our revenue is only going up by 2 percent this
year, but our costs are going up by 10 percent! What
are we going to do?!!”
Never
has the difference between the mentality of
government and business been clearer than when this
question is answered.
“Oh my
god, we can’t do this! How are we supposed to give
them everything they want when we have so little
money? We are going to have to cut back! We are
going to lay people off. If they won’t give us
enough money, how can they expect to get the
services? This is terrible!”
As
compared to:
“How
are we going to make this work? How can we generate
more money? Anyone have any ideas on other ways we
can increase revenue?”
The
incessant whining over budget cutbacks, caps and the
like shows that a lot of the people who run this
state are not accustomed to dealing with adversity.
For far too long government at all levels of New
Jersey have looked upon the taxpayer with avarice
and disdain, as if our sole purpose was to fund
whatever they wanted funded.
Now they
are going to have to change. And as above, the
change will constitute either primarily cutbacks or
enhanced revenue.
Cutbacks
are pretty well understood. We lay people off; we
don’t repave streets as often; the football team
disappears.
Less
understood is the revenue enhancement side. How can
a town generate more money?
Fees?
Well, yes to an extent but not enough to balance the
budget. More ratables? Now here we have something.
The best
ratables are businesses. Businesses pay taxes at the
same rate as a homeowner but usually a lot more of
them due to their size. And a typical business
doesn’t use many services. I have yet to meet a
business that enrolls its kids (subsidiaries) in the
local school system.
We all
know that New Jersey in general is not a friendly
place to do business. However, at the municipal
level is where doing business can become really
tough. And the wealthier the town, the harder it is
to do business.
Take
Linden, for example. Linden is considered by many to
be the most business-friendly city in the state. A
democratic bastion, this has remained true through
successive mayors and councils.
Business
is embraced in Linden and everyone from the mayor
down works to make sure a new business is welcomed
and an old business is treated with respect. Linden
also provides an amazing array of services at a tax
rate far below the norm.
Linden
is well placed to survive and thrive under the
property tax cap. The city has the desire, resources
and knowhow to grow its tax base.
Contrast
Linden with Springfield, considered to be one of the
most unfriendly towns in the state when it comes to
setting up a business. Filled with self-appointed
resident committees who complain with great effect,
few businesses are successful getting the approvals
needed to conduct business.
Thus,
the residents of towns like Springfield will bear
the full ramifications of the tax cap. Why would a
business locate in one of these unfriendly towns
when there are friendlier environments in other New
Jersey communities or other states that will welcome
their investments, their jobs and their tax
revenues?
Perhaps
the real silver lining in the property tax cap is
not that taxes will stop growing so fast, but that
the state at all levels will be forced to reevaluate
its anti-business attitudes and make New Jersey a
business-friendly state at last.
James Coyle
President
Copyright James Coyle 2010
Top




After
New Jersey legislators and Gov. Chris Christie
reached a compromise to pass a $29.4 billion budget
and then hammered out an agreement on capping annual
property tax increases at 2 percent, Christie was
reported to have told lawmakers he would get better
at the budgeting process.
The
Legislature had better join the governor at
improving. While the negotiations that led to the
budget compromise were surprisingly amicable and the
compromise on the property tax cap was bipartisan,
the final solution – a Legislature-passed cap versus
a constitutional amendment passed by voter
referendum – leaves much work to be done to ensure
that New Jersey’s mayors and town councils can meet
the cap without devastating local services and
education and without subverting it with exemptions.
Make no
mistake, reducing the cap on property tax increases
from the current 4 percent to 2 percent is a step in
the right direction. Property taxes in New Jersey
have increased more than 70 percent in the last 11
years, more than double the rate of inflation. While
the rate of increase has more than halved since the
introduction of a 4 percent cap in 2007 – from 7.2
percent to 3.3 percent – New Jersey residents still
pay the highest property taxes in the nation on a
per capita basis.
The
problem with the 2 percent solution is similar to
that of the 4 percent cap. There are exceptions to
the cap – albeit far fewer – that can allow local
governments to exceed the cap. Of greater concern,
with a Legislature-passed cap versus a
constitutional amendment, lawmakers can make changes
later that might further weaken the cap and
undermine its effectiveness.
A
constitutional amendment would have (1) placed the
issue directly in the hands of those most affected
by it, the state’s residents and homeowners, and (2)
removed any temptation on the Legislature to tweak
the law in the future.
As the
decision has not been left with the voters, it now
falls on the governor and lawmakers to “get better”
at helping local governments meet their obligations
to residents while staying under the cap.
There
are exceptions to the cap that include pension and
health benefits, capital expenditures and certain
emergencies. These are areas that are largely beyond
the control of local governments.
Yet
certain major drivers of increases in local expenses
will not be addressed by the 2 percent cap – namely
arbitrated salary increases for police and
firefighters and unfunded state mandates. While
police and fire salary increases statewide have
averaged 4 percent since 2000, the real impact on
municipal budgets averages between 6 and 10 percent
due to administrative calculations, according to the
New Jersey League of Municipalities.
Unfunded
mandates that place severe and undue strain on
municipal budgets touch on everything from planning
for constantly changing affordable housing
regulations to storm water management. In a state
known for home rule, municipalities have been
overrun by the cost of mandates that often have no
logical relation to the realities within their
borders.
While
the 2 percent cap will limit increases in property
taxes, it will not place such a constraint on
arbitrated salary increases and unfunded mandates.
Therefore, the Christie administration has proposed
a slate of 33 bills – the so-called tool kit – that
the governor believes will help municipalities rein
in expenses currently beyond the control of local
governments, including capping annual increases in
public employee contracts, inclusive of binding
arbitration awards. The governor also has taken
positive steps toward reducing unfunded mandates and
onerous regulations on municipalities and the
business community.
These
are steps that need to be turned into strides and
then leaps if local governments are to be given a
fair shot at meeting the new limits on property tax
increases without shortchanging residents. This is
the time for the Legislature to join Gov. Christie
in getting better at this.
As with
economic downturns of the past, the current
recession has brought one silver lining. Businesses
of all sizes and within every sector have learned to
operate more efficiently.
Companies have discovered or developed ways of
producing products and services with fewer
resources.
This is
a lesson local government and school boards will
learn over the next few years as they strive to
creatively do more with less while New Jersey rights
its foundering ship of state. A constitutional
amendment for a 2 percent cap in property tax
increases would have been more in line with the
sink-or-swim scenario the business community faced
during the recession. For now the compromise between
the governor and Legislature has a built-in life
preserver.
We’re
not out of the deep water yet. We still need to get
better at this.
Top




CREATING JOBS FOR AMERICA
By
Thomas Donohue
Carlos
Sanchez is discussed on the front page of this
newspaper because he represents American free
enterprise at its best. With hard work and a good
idea, Carlos built something out of nothing and, in
the process, helped those who attend his boot camps
live healthier lives.
But if
current trends continue, it may be harder for others
to realize similar success.
The
congressional leadership and the administration have
taken their eyes off the ball when it comes to
America’s top priority – creating jobs. Although the
economy may be growing again, it is not growing
nearly fast enough to create the 20 million jobs
we’ll need in the next 10 years to replace those
lost in the recession and to keep up with a growing
population.
Instead
of partnering with the business community and
embracing proven ideas for job creation, the
congressional leadership and the administration have
embarked on a course of rapid government expansion,
major tax increases and suffocating regulations.
As the
president has said repeatedly, prosperity and job
growth come from the private sector, not from the
government. Government’s role is to establish the
right conditions so that the private sector can
invest, grow, compete, create new products and
services, and put Americans back to work.
Here are
the recommendations of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce
for jolting our economy back to life.
Let’s
start by addressing America’s uncompetitive tax
rates. This Congress has already raised taxes by
almost $700 billion to pay for health care, stimulus
and other programs. Proposals in the capital
markets, energy and climate change arenas would
raise hundreds of billions more.
And
beginning next year, Americans will be hit with the
largest tax increase in history.
Our weak
economy simply cannot sustain such massive tax
hikes. We urge Congress and the administration to
immediately support at least a temporary extension
of the tax relief passed in the prior decade. We
must also reduce the corporate tax rate to spur
investment and job growth.
Spending
is also going through the roof and deficits right
along with it. Instead of expanding entitlements,
Congress and the administration should control and
modernize them without
delay. Sustained economic growth can help bring down
the deficit, but we will also need to generate
additional revenues. Our policy challenge is to do
so in ways that do not undermine economic growth or
competitiveness.
The
president said that millions of American jobs can be
created by doubling U.S. exports in five years, and
we agree. We can start by immediately passing
pending free trade agreements and reviving global
trade talks known as the Doha Round.
Millions
of jobs, as well as our global competitiveness and
quality of life, depend on modernizing all forms of
American infrastructure. We must remove the
regulatory, legal and financial roadblocks to
private investment.
The
regulatory burden imposed on the job creators of our
country has reached a tipping point. Congress
approved a 2,800-page health care bill that includes
a new employer mandate and hundreds of billions of
dollars in business taxes. The Senate is poised to
pass a sweeping financial reform bill fraught with
unintended consequences, huge new bureaucracies, and
higher taxes and fees. The Environmental Protection
Agency and Labor Department are embarking on an
unprecedented amount of regulatory action.
Congress
and the administration must address the cumulative
impact of this regulatory avalanche to restore
certainty, unleash investment and create a better
atmosphere for job creation.
It is
imperative that business and government leaders work
with each other, not against each other. Our current
economic direction is not working, and it’s
undermining our position in a tough and competitive
global economy.
That’s
why the U.S. Chamber launched the American Free
Enterprise. Dream Big. campaign. Through
advertisements, outreach to young Americans, town
hall meetings and more, the chamber is reminding the
American people that only a return to our free
enterprise values will get the economy moving
forward again. Please visit www.FreeEnterprise.com
and join our efforts.
Thomas
Donohue is president and CEO of the U.S. Chamber of
Commerce, the world’s largest business federation.
Top




By Keld Jensen
In the
wake of the Deepwater Horizon oil rig explosion,
hundreds of millions of gallons of crude oil have
leaked into the Gulf of Mexico. But that is not the
only thing leaking right now; the business community
is watching trust and credibility slowly seep away.
The oil
spill is just the latest example of the devastating
economic effects of corporate irresponsibility.
Questionable banking practices played a significant
role in the recession, and now BP’s poor safety
practices may have been responsible for causing the
largest offshore oil spill in American history.
But
these events also are having a more indirect
economic impact by shaking the trust that is the
foundation for all commercial transactions.
A recent
article in Bloomberg Business Week cites various
ways that a lack of trust can have economy-wide
consequences. Lost faith in banks and other
financial institutions, for instance, can dampen
enthusiasm for investing, with obvious consequences
for growth. One economist quoted in the article
notes an enormous body of research showing that
trust in institutions is vital to a country’s
economic development.
But this
is a problem that goes well beyond the public losing
faith in the nation’s banks and corporations. Even
within the business community, trust has been
leaking away for years.
In 16
years as a negotiation consultant, I have seen
countless transactions fall apart for one simple
reason: a complete lack of honesty and trust.
Instead of being open about their needs and
cooperating toward a common goal, the two parties
inevitably treat the negotiation like a poker game.
They keep secrets, bluff the opposition and do
everything to “win” at the expense of the person
across the table.
It is an
approach that causes more than a third of
negotiations to fail. In those that succeed, the
mutual distrust and secrecy causes the parties to
miss out on countless variables that could have
provided gains for both.
The
hostile and untrusting attitude that pervades
virtually any commercial transaction is cyclical:
both sides know they can expect secrecy and
deception from the other, and therefore
instinctively come to the table from a position of
mutual mistrust.
And do
not think for a minute that contentious negotiations
only happen in big corporate mergers. Thousands of
negotiations take place every day, from the biggest
acquisition to the smallest sale, and as long as
things continue as they are, mistrust and dishonesty
will remain the currency of the business world.
If trust
is to return to the economy, it will not happen
through increased regulation, which only creates new
legal hoops for corporations to jump through without
addressing the underlying problem. Rather, it will
happen when the business community creates a culture
based on trust, honesty and fair dealing, and brings
those values to every commercial transaction.
Of
course, tigers are not going to change their stripes
overnight and they certainly are not going to turn
over a new leaf out of an altruistic desire to help
the economy. Instead, they will do it for the same
reason they do everything – because it helps their
bottom line. When it comes to negotiation, being
open and honest with the guy on the other side of
the table will help both parties, as they discover
new opportunities to create value and see the
benefits of building a long-term partnership.
If the
business community wants to regain the public’s
trust, then they have to start by changing their
very culture. Or to put it another way: before
corporations can expect people to trust them, they
have to start by trusting each other.
Keld Jensen is managing director
of MarketWatch Management, an independent
consultancy and research organization, and an
associate professor at Copenhagen Business School.
Top







John
LaPilusa, CPA, of accounting firm
Fazio, Mannuzza, Roche, Tankel,
LaPilusa, LLC, in Cranford
recently was reappointed by the Sisters of St.
Joseph of Peace Health Care System Corp. as a
trustee and treasurer of the Cusack Care Center at
St. Joseph’s Home for the Blind for 2010-2011.
_______________________________________________
Berkeley
College, with campuses throughout the New York
metropolitan area, has launched the Berkeley College
Combat Veterans Education Partnership, designed to
meet the academic and career goals of disabled
combat veterans. The distance learning program
offers associate and bachelor degrees through the
Berkeley College School of Business and the School
of Professional Studies. Disabled combat veterans
can enroll in the program and begin their studies
while recovering at a military installation.
Berkeley College also has been selected as an
on-base partner at McGuire Air Force Base in New
Hanover Township.
In
addition, Berkeley College recently raised more than
$5,300 for the 2010 Diversity Stride as more than
120 Berkeley team walkers participated in the event
at Liberty State Park. Money raised funds the
American Conference on Diversity’s Youth Leadership
Institute Programs.
_______________________________________________
Lindabury, McCormick, Estabrook & Cooper P.C.
has named Tara Brown, Kevin Murphy and Brigitte
Radigan as summer associates. Brown attends Rutgers
Law School in Newark. Murphy is studying at Seton
Hall University School of Law. Radigan also is
attending Seton Hall University School of Law.

Brigitte
Radigan (left), Kevin Murphy and Tara Brown.
_______________________________________________
Infineum
has been recognized with the American Chemistry
Council Responsible Care® Company of the Year Award
in the medium-sized company. To be eligible for the
award a company must perform in the top 10 percent
of its size category in employee safety during the
past three years, have zero significant process
safety incidents in the past year, and utilize best
practices in communications with communities and key
stakeholders.
_______________________________________________
The
Lions Eye Bank of New Jersey recently hosted an
open house at its new 4,000-square-foot residence in
Clark. The open house featured different interactive
stations and guests had an opportunity to tour the
new laboratory, watch educational videos, view the
Eye Bank’s Donor Tribute Web site (www.donortribute.org)
and sign up on the Donate Life NJ Donor Registry.

_______________________________________________
The
Bayway Complex Community Advisory Panel, an
organization of local community and industry
representatives, recently awarded $1,000
scholarships to four local students: Adam Staryak of
Rahway High School; Daniel Niedzwiedzki of Linden
High School; Ahmad Masi Abdul Zaher of Elizabeth
High School Upper Academy; and Nicholas Joseph Fusco
of Moore Catholic High School in Staten Island. The
four $1,000 scholarships were awarded to local high
school seniors who will be pursuing careers in
engineering or process technology.

In
addition, two high school juniors, Piterson
Massenat-Desir from Linden High School and Chisom
Emeana from Benedictine Academy in Elizabeth,
received scholarships to attend New Jersey Institute
of Technology Pre-college Academy this summer.
Guillermo Corrales, an Elizabeth High School Upper
Academy student, also has been awarded the 2010
ConocoPhillips Excellence in Science scholarship.
The $1,000 award will support Guillermo’s studies in
aerospace and mechanical engineering at Rutgers
College in Newark.
_______________________________________________
PSE&G
recently was awarded with the Celebrating
Philanthropy Award honoring the Newark-based company
at the Trinitas Health Foundation Annual
Gala. The event, which celebrated the Medical
Center’s 10th anniversary, raised nearly $450,000
for the hospital.
Staff
members from L’Oréal USA, Clark
Manufacturing, Consumer Products Division
recently spent the day at Trinitas Regional Medical
Center facilitating a day of volunteering.
Partnering with Groundwork Elizabeth and the
Elizabeth Garden Club, the volunteers beautified the
landscaped triangle that welcomes visitors to the
Williamson Street Campus of Trinitas while Brother
Bonaventure Extended Care Center residents received
special treatment from L’Oréal staff members.
In
addition, Nancy DiLiegro, vice president of clinical
services at Trinitas, has taken over as chair of the
American Heart Association Northern New Jersey
Regional Board of Directors, following a year as
chair-elect.

_______________________________________________
Spencer
Savings Bank recently announced the local
winners of its annual scholarship program. Vibhuti
Shah (Union High School) and Olubusayo Grace Alofe
(Union Burnet Middle School) were awarded academic
scholarships. An award of $1,000 was give nto
Vibhuti and a $500 Coverdell Education Savings
Account (CESA) was awarded to Olubusayo, in
recognition of their hard work and dedication
throughout the school year.

Since
its inception in 2002, the Spencer Scholarship
Program has awarded more than $200,000 to
exceptional students in recognition of their
academic achievements. Spencer Savings Bank also
recently co-sponsored “Movies Under the Stars,”
along with the Cranford Jaycees, at Hanson Park in
Cranford. Volunteers from both Spencer Savings and
the Cranford Jaycees served refreshments and popcorn
to more than 350 people.

 





 

















|
|